The Local Yarn

 

Friday August 5, 2005

Reader’s Lukewarm Digest

Reader’s Digest is a cheap publication that is not worthy of your attention.

It has degenerated into a cycle of the same four topics: dieting, mortgages, celebrities, and medication.

A magazine with a title like Reader’s Digest ought to have some kind of literary interest. It ought to introduce new ideas. It ought to improve your command of the language, and to inspire by some amount of genius, however small.

I wouldn’t be so bitter about it if the magazine didn’t pretend to be something it isn’t. You don’t ordinarily get annoyed with a saltine cracker, but you do if it sells itself as a goblet of grape juice.

(Trying to make the 68% vitriol quota for the year)

Read more from The Blog, or from the series ‘Under Glass’

❡

May 8, 2014 — Businessweek just posted an article about the similar decline of the Freakonomics franchise.

Note that both Freakonomics and Reader’s Digest have declined in the same way: by lapsing into a pattern of regurgitating things that have been public knowledge for a long time.

Further note: Businessweek’s news about Freakonomics is itself not new, just as the post above about Reader’s Digest is not new (and wasn’t even new when I first wrote it!).

Ergo, both the Businessweek article and this very post are examples of old news about old news.

— Joel (Author) · 9 May 2014

Add to the original piece by submitting your note below. Think of yourself as a co-author on the piece above and write accordingly. These aren't normal blog comments: this is a submission for publication. Read the guidelines below the form if you’re new here.


(Will not display)


For future comments: this info


Formatting syntax: all basic & extra Markdown is supported.
*italics*, **bold**, -- em-dash [Link](http://wikipedia.org)
> Block quotation

Subscribe by email or RSS to be notified of new comments.

  • Notes will be discarded if they lack relevance, substance, clarity, accuracy, or delightfulness that is of a kind with that of the original article.
  • Published notes will be included in the blog and sent to email and RSS subscribers, as well as being added to this page.
  • If you prefer, write up your thoughts on your own blog, and submit a short note with a link to your post (we also support webmentions for this). Or if someone else has already made a good argument you agree with, submit a short note with a link. We’ll almost always publish these kinds of notes, as long as the posts they link to are relevant.
  • If making claims, cite sources wherever possible.
  • It’s never too late to submit a note. Notes are often added to posts several years old.
  • If you just want to leave a general note of appreciation or complaint, use our feedback form instead.

Your note will be reviewed before being published. This site has the squelch filter set higher than most, in order to eliminate low-substance chatter, and to create a curated exhibit of related ideas. We may follow up with you via email if we feel edits are needed.


Subscribe by Email or RSS
Send Feedback

The Local Yarn is a publication by Joel & Jessica Dueck of original writing, commentary, and art, and is only partially fictitious.

· Since 1998 ·
Colophon, Errata